The retinal bacillary layer detachment: Clinical features and outcomes in posterior uveitis.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics, presentation and response to treatment in posterior uveitis patients with bacillary layer detachment (BLD) seen on optical coherence tomography (OCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with posterior uveitis and SD-OCT scans consistent with BLD. Data collected included demographics, uveitic etiology, treatment and duration of follow-up. Outcome measures included macular volume, central subfoveal thickness and visual acuity. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (20 eyes) were included. Twelve were female (75%). The mean age was 43.68 ± 14.7 years. The most frequent etiology of the uveitis was Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease (n=10), followed by sympathetic ophthalmia (n=2). BLD was bilateral in four patients. Eight patients were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone boluses. Immunosuppressive therapies were required in 8 patients. The mean follow-up was 70 months (range: 2.0-216.0). CONCLUSION: BLD was observed in a series of posterior uveitis cases of various etiologies, showing functional and structural resolution with treatment in most cases.

Tuberculosis-Related Uveitis in Patients under Anti-TNF-alpha Therapy: A Case Series.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) have emerged as an effective treatment in noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Anti-TNF may increase the predisposition to infectious disease as tuberculosis (TB). TB-related uveitis in the context of an uveitogenic concurrent systemic immune-mediated disease under anti-TNF treatment remain a diagnostic challenge, deserving special focus on this rare context. Retrospective chart review of patients on anti-TNF drugs for systemic immune-mediated diseases that developed a multicentric microbiologically confirmed active TB with concurrent intraocular involvement.Three patients were recorded. Screening for TB before starting anti-TNF resulted negative in two patients. The other patient had received anti-tuberculous treatment in the past. All showed a microbiologically confirmed extraocular TB after unexpected atypical reactivation of the uveitis shifting to chronic granulomatous pattern.Specialists should be aware of TB reactivation, even with previous negative screening, when ocular uveitis signs and activity do not match with the expected pattern in a patient on anti-TNF drugs.

Multimodal imaging in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome.

Two cases are reported of acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSE) that presented with peripapillary white spots in the fundus. AIBSE belongs to the acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR) complex. Conditions of this AZOOR complex may overlap. Typically, in AIBSE, a peripapillary hyperautofluorescence is seen in the autofluorescence. En-face OCT angiography at the ellipsoid level showed hyper-reflective spots around the optic disk in both cases. One case showed a reversible enlargement of the blind spot in visual field. AZOOR complex is an inflammatory disorder that affects the outer retina, and can now be confirmed with structural optical coherence tomography. In the cases presented, there was a reversible severe loss of the outer retina.

Imagen multimodal en el síndrome de aumento idiopático de mancha ciega / Multimodal imaging in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome

Presentamos dos casos clínicos ilustrativos con imagen multimodal de síndrome de aumento idiopático de mancha ciega (SAIMC), que debutan con puntos blancos peripapilares en el fondo de ojo. El SAIMC se engloba dentro del complejo de retinopatía zonal aguda oculta externa (AZOOR), solapándose en muchas ocasiones diferentes entidades dentro de este complejo. La hiperautofluorescencia en estos casos es típicamente peripapilar. En el en-face de la angiografía por OCT (A-OCT), a nivel de la capa de los elipsoides, se observan puntos hiperreflectivos peripapilares en ambos casos. En uno de ellos disponemos del campo visual que muestra aumento de mancha ciega reversible. El complejo AZOOR tiene en común la afectación de la retina externa que actualmente podemos demostrar con el OCT estructural. En ambos casos se observa una afectación de las capas externas que se recuperan progresivamente (AU)

Two cases are reported of acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSE) that presented with peripapillary white spots in the fundus. AIBSE belongs to the acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR) complex. Conditions of this AZOOR complex may overlap. Typically, in AIBSE, a peripapillary hyperautofluorescence is seen in the autofluorescence. En-face OCT angiography at the ellipsoid level showed hyper-reflective spots around the optic disk in both cases. One case showed a reversible enlargement of the blind spot in visual field. AZOOR complex is an inflammatory disorder that affects the outer retina, and can now be confirmed with structural optical coherence tomography. In the cases presented, there was a reversible severe loss of the outer retina (AU)

Atypical toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis in patients with malignant hematological diseases. / Retinocoroiditis toxoplásmica de presentación atípica en pacientes con enfermedades hematológicas malignas.

In immunocompromised patients, toxoplasmosis may have atypical presentation with bilateral, extensive or multifocal involvement. We report a case series of atypical toxoplasmic retinocoroiditis in patients with malignant hematological diseases who are usually immunosuppressed. Four patients were diagnosed of atypical toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis, all of them had immunosuppression (100%) and half of them (50%) had received a bone marrow transplant. The polymerase chain reaction for toxoplasma was positive in 75% of cases, and in one case (25%) the diagnosis was made with clinical and serological criteria. One patient presented ocular toxoplasmosis despite being on prophylactic treatment with atovaquone. Patients with atypical ocular toxoplasmosis and hematological diseases are generally immunocompromised, but they do not always have history of a bone marrow transplant. The presentation may be due to a primary infection or a reactivation of the disease. The aqueous humor and/or vitreous polymerase chain reaction allow confirming the diagnosis to perform a proper treatment.

Ocular Toxocariasis: Beyond Typical Patterns through the New Imaging Technologies.

PURPOSE: To report five cases of ocular Toxocariasis (OT) in which ultrawide-field (UWF) imaging was helpful in diagnosis and assessment. OT is an underdiagnosed condition triggered by the ocular invasion of Toxocara larvae. Typical features are peripheral granuloma or endophthalmitis. METHODS: A retrospective case series of 10 outpatients were studied by complete ophthalmologic examination and complementary tests. UWF retinal imaging, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) were retrospectively analyzed. Five patients with suspected OT were included. RESULTS: UWF imaging and FAF was able to detect all retinal lesions in a single rapid capture. Two patients showed positive serology for Toxocara. An image suggesting the larva in the vitreous cavity was shown in one patient. Antihelmintic 15 treatment along with steroids was prescribed in two patients. CONCLUSION: UWF imaging and SDOCT provide a more efficient approach and follow-up in OT, raising final standards of care.

Complicaciones no farmacológicas asociadas a la inyección de implante intravítreo de dexametasona / Non-pharmacological complications associated with Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVOS: El implante intravítreo de dexametasona (IID) es de gran utilidad en el manejo del edema macular (EM). La eficacia y seguridad del fármaco han sido ampliamente demostradas, siendo la hipertensión ocular y el desarrollo de catarata las complicaciones más frecuentes. El uso del IID en los últimos años ha permitido describir retrospectivamente algunas de las complicaciones raras, pero potencialmente graves que pueden sobrevenir tras su inyección. MÉTODOS: Presentamos un estudio retrospectivo que describe estas complicaciones en una serie de 15 ojos, bien asociadas a la inyección o al propio dispositivo: migración a cámara anterior, inyección intracristaliniana, endoftalmitis o segmentación entre otros. También se distinguió entre complicaciones propiamente dichas y las que no conllevaron daño ocular. Se recopilaron los datos epidemiológicos y basales, el manejo terapéutico y la evolución. Según disponibilidad, los casos fueron descritos mediante imagen multimodal. RESULTADOS: La incidencia de estas complicaciones fue del 0,65%. La migración del implante fue la complicación más frecuente (n = 4): un ojo afáquico, uno con lente de fijación iridiana y 2 seudofáquicos. La inyección intracristaliniana y la endoftalmitis (n=2) fueron las siguientes en frecuencia. El periodo de aparición de las complicaciones fue variable. La forma de presentación clínica más frecuente fue la disminución de la agudeza visual (n = 6). El tratamiento con IDD fue eficaz en la mayoría de los casos a pesar de las complicaciones. CONCLUSIONES: Es importante conocer estas complicaciones no farmacológicas e identificar los factores de riesgo que pueden limitar el potencial daño ocular derivado

OBJECTIVE: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IID) is an effective and safe treatment for macular oedema as described in the literature. Ocular hypertension and cataracts are the most frequent complications. The indications of IID in the last few years have led to the retrospective reporting of rare complications, with potential visual impact related to the injection procedure. METHODS: A case series is presented of fifteen patients treated with IID for macular oedema who developed non-pharmacological complications related to the injection procedure or the implant itself, including, among others anterior chamber migration, intracrystalline injection, endophthalmitis, or segmentation. Differentiation was made between true complications and those that did not lead to any ocular damage. Epidemiological and baseline data were collected along with the treatment and outcome in each case. An analysis was made of multimodal imaging available. RESULTS: The incidence of complications was 0.65% in this series Anterior chamber migration was the most frequent complication (n = 4), followed by intracrystalline injection, and endophthalmitis (n = 2). The times between the injection and complications were variable. Visual impairment was the most common symptom (n=6). However, despite the complications found, IID was an effective treatment in most of the reported cases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of these rare non-pharmacological complications so that they may be prevented and detected early, avoiding irreversible ocular damage

Non-pharmacological complications associated with Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection. / Complicaciones no farmacológicas asociadas a la inyección de implante intravítreo de dexametasona.

OBJECTIVE: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IID) is an effective and safe treatment for macular oedema as described in the literature. Ocular hypertension and cataracts are the most frequent complications. The indications of IID in the last few years have led to the retrospective reporting of rare complications, with potential visual impact related to the injection procedure. METHODS: A case series is presented of fifteen patients treated with IID for macular oedema who developed non-pharmacological complications related to the injection procedure or the implant itself, including, among others anterior chamber migration, intracrystalline injection, endophthalmitis, or segmentation. Differentiation was made between true complications and those that did not lead to any ocular damage. Epidemiological and baseline data were collected along with the treatment and outcome in each case. An analysis was made of multimodal imaging available. RESULTS: The incidence of complications was 0.65% in this series Anterior chamber migration was the most frequent complication (n=4), followed by intracrystalline injection, and endophthalmitis (n=2). The times between the injection and complications were variable. Visual impairment was the most common symptom (n=6). However, despite the complications found, IID was an effective treatment in most of the reported cases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of these rare non-pharmacological complications so that they may be prevented and detected early, avoiding irreversible ocular damage.

Manejo de la ampolla isquémica hiperfiltrante: crosslinking mediante el uso de riboflavina y radiación ultravioleta versus deslizamiento conjuntival y autotrasplante de conjuntiva / Management of the hyper-filtrating ischaemic bleb: crosslinking with riboflavin and UV radiation versus a conjunctival sliding flap and conjunctival autologous graft

INTRODUCCIÓN: En este estudio se com:para y evalúa la seguridad y los resultados clínicos de 3 técnicas para el manejo de las ampollas isquémicas hiperfiltrantes en glaucoma: el crosslinking con riboflavina (CXL) respecto al deslizamiento y el autotrasplante conjuntival. MÉTODOS: Se seleccionaron un total de 24 ojos de 18 pacientes con ampollas isquémicas intervenidos de cirugía filtrante de glaucoma entre 2012 y 2017. Fueron intervenidos de CXL mediante el uso de riboflavina (n = 4), autotrasplante conjuntival (n = 5) y deslizamiento conjuntival (n = 15). Se comparan los resultados de la presión intraocular (PIO) previa al procedimiento y a los 12 meses, así como de la agudeza visual y de la medicación antiglaucomatosa previa y a los 12 meses. RESULTADOS: Los 4 de la riboflavina pasaron de una PIO media previa de 12,11 ± 3,14 a una PIO al año de 12,32 ± 5,29 (p = 0,655). Los 5 ojos del autotrasplante de conjuntiva tuvieron una PIO previa media de 11,65 ± 5,76 y al año de 14,68 ± 7,21 (p = 0,273). Los 15 ojos tratados mediante deslizamiento conjuntival presentaron una PIO previa de 9,32 ± 5,34 y al año de 15,16 ± 9,24 (p = 0,021). No hubo efectos adversos ni complicaciones asociadas a ninguna de las 3 técnicas. CONCLUSIONES: El manejo de la ampolla isquémica hiperfiltrante resulta difícil. Los procedimientos quirúrgicos se asocian a incrementos tensionales y a necesidad de medicación, mientras que el CXL mediante el uso de riboflavina y radiación UV no parece tener un efecto sobre la revitalización de la ampolla

INTRODUCTION: This article compares and evaluates the safety and clinical results of 3 techniques for the management of hyper-filtrating ischaemic bleb in glaucoma, such as collagen crosslinking (CXL) with riboflavin versus conjunctival sliding and conjunctival autologous graft. METHODS: A total of 24 eyes were selected from 18 patients with ischemic blebs that underwent filtering glaucoma surgery between 2012 and 2017 and subjected them to crosslinking using riboflavin (n = 4), conjunctival autologous graft (n = 5), and conjunctival sliding (n = 15). The results of the intraocular pressure (IOP) prior to the procedure and at 12 months were compared, as well as visual acuity and previous anti-glaucoma medication at 12 months. RESULTS: The 4 eyes that underwent CXL, went from a previous mean IOP of 12.11 ± 3.14 to an IOP of 12.32 ±5.29 at one year (P = .655). Five eyes were treated by conjunctival autologous graft, had a previous mean IOP of 11.65 ± 5.76 and an IOP at one year of 14.68 ± 7.21 (P = .273). Fifteen eyes subjected to conjunctival sliding had a previous IOP of 9.32 ±5.34 and at one year it was 15.16 ± 9.24 (P =. 021). There were no adverse effects or complications associated with any of the 3 techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The management of the hyper-filtrating ischaemic bleb is difficult. Surgical procedures are associated with increased IOP and need for medication, while CXL using riboflavin and UV radiation does not seem to have an effect on the revitalisation of the bleb

Management of the hyper-filtrating ischaemic bleb: crosslinking with riboflavin and UV radiation versus a conjunctival sliding flap and conjunctival autologous graft. / Manejo de la ampolla isquémica hiperfiltrante: crosslinking mediante el uso de riboflavina y radiación ultravioleta versus deslizamiento conjuntival y autotrasplante de conjuntiva.

INTRODUCTION: This article compares and evaluates the safety and clinical results of 3techniques for the management of hyper-filtrating ischaemic bleb in glaucoma, such as collagen crosslinking (CXL) with riboflavin versus conjunctival sliding and conjunctival autologous graft. METHODS: A total of 24 eyes were selected from 18 patients with ischemic blebs that underwent filtering glaucoma surgery between 2012 and 2017 and subjected them to crosslinking using riboflavin (n=4), conjunctival autologous graft (n=5), and conjunctival sliding (n=15). The results of the intraocular pressure (IOP) prior to the procedure and at 12 months were compared, as well as visual acuity and previous anti-glaucoma medication at 12 months. RESULTS: The 4eyes that underwent CXL, went from a previous mean IOP of 12.11 ± 3.14 to an IOP of 12.32 ±5.29 at one year (P=.655). Five eyes were treated by conjunctival autologous graft, had a previous mean IOP of 11.65 ± 5.76 and an IOP at one year of 14.68 ± 7.21 (P=.273). Fifteen eyes subjected to conjunctival sliding had a previous IOP of 9.32 ±5.34 and at one year it was 15.16 ± 9.24 (P=.021). There were no adverse effects or complications associated with any of the 3techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The management of the hyper-filtrating ischaemic bleb is difficult. Surgical procedures are associated with increased IOP and need for medication, while CXL using riboflavin and UV radiation does not seem to have an effect on the revitalisation of the bleb.